Scientific articles in chilean agricultural sciences 1989 - 2016: evolution, disciplines and impact in terms of leading in their field
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22231/asyd.v19i2.1316Keywords:
bibliometrics, Chile, agricultural science, scientific collaboration, internationalization, scientific productionAbstract
We present the results from our research undertaken in the context of agricultural sciences in Chile, for a period stretching between 1989 until 2016, during which 5.873 scientific articles related to this scientific area were analyzed. For this research, bibliometric indicators of scientific activity were used to analyze the evolution of articles written for Chilean agrarian science, scientific collaboration, assessing which disciplines have received most attention and their overall level in terms of leadership. A sustained increase in scientific article output was observed to have taken place during the study period, combined with thematic concentration in the disciplines of veterinary sciences, fisheries and agronomy, and recent changes have also occurred in terms of how scientific collaboration is articulated, with more international participation, especially on the part of the United States.
References
Arias J, Zuluaga C. 2014. Financiación y ejecución de las actividades de investigación y desarrollo en Latinoamérica. Hallazgos, 11(22), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.15332/s1794-3841.2014.0022.16
Callon M, Courtial JP, Penan H. 1995. Cienciometría. El estudio cuantitativo de la actividad científica. España: Trea.
CONICYT. 2014. Principales indicadores cienciométricos de la actividad científica chilena 2012. Informe 2014. Una mirada a 10 años. Madrid - Valparaíso: Altazor Ediciones.
CONICYT. 2015. Principales indicadores cienciométricos de la actividad científica chilena 2013. Informe 2015. Santiago. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Devyatkin D, Nechaeva E, Suvorov R, Tikhomirov I. 2018. Mapping the Research Landscape of Agricultural Sciences. Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), 12(1), 69–78. Recuperado de https://ideas.repec.org/a/hig/fsight/v12y2018i1p69-78.html
Di Meglio F. 2018. Factores que favorecen la vinculación de las universidades con los sectores productivos en Argentina. Revista iberoamericana de educación superior, 9(24), 58–80. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.20072872e.2018.24.262
Escalante E. 2009. Una nota metodológica sobre los análisis cualitativos. El análisis de las relaciones entre los elementos: El análisis de las frecuencias y co-ocurrencias. Theoria, 18(1), 57–67.
Garg KC, Kumar S, Lal K. 2006. Scientometric profile of Indian agricultural research as seen through Science Citation Index Expanded. Scientometrics, 68(1), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0088-y
Gay C. 1862. Historia Física y Política de Chile. Santiago: Biblioteca Nacional de Chile. Gobierno de Chile.
Gutiérrez C, Gutiérrez F. 2008. Forjadores de la ciencia en Chile. Problemas y soluciones. Santiago: Ril editores.
Kreimer Pablo. 1994. Estudios sociales de la ciencia: algunos aspectos de la conformación de un campo. Redes, 2. Recuperado de https://ridaa.unq.edu.ar/bitstream/handle/20.500.11807/305/05R1994v1n2.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Kreimer Pablo. 2011. La evaluación de la actividad científica: desde la indagación sociológica a la burocratización. La evaluación y sus contextos conceptuales. Propuesta educativa, 2(36), 2–59.
Matus C. 2015. Discursos de internacionalización como una forma de repensar la universidad. In: La educación superior en Chile. Transformación, desarrollo y crisis (Bernasconi). Santiago: Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile. pp: 447–473.
MINECON (Ministerio de Economía, Fomento y Turismo). 2015. Boletín estudio medición de créditos presupuestarios públicos para I+D_GBAORD, segunda versión. Santiago.
OECD. 2015. Frascati Manual 2015 - Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development. OECD Publishing.
Persson O, Glänzel W, Danell R. 2004. Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. In: Scientometrics (Vol. 60). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000034384.35498.7d pp: 421–432.
Pomareda C, Hartwich F. 2006. Innovación agrícola en América Latina: comprendiendo el papel del sector privado. Lima: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Recuperado de https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/fprissbrf/42sp.htm
Pouris A. 1989. A scientometric assessment of agricultural research in South Africa. Scientometrics, 17(5–6), 401–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017461
Rojas-Sola JI, San Antonio-Gómez C. 2010. Bybliometric analysis of Argentinean scientific publications in the Agriculture, Multidisciplinary subject category in Web of Science database (1997-2009). Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, 42(2), 71–83.
Sada de Carlo L. 1860. La Quinta Normal y la enseñanza de la agricultura en Chile. Santiago: Imprenta del Ferrocarril. Recuperado de http://www.memoriachilena.cl/602/w3-article-132452.html
Salinas A. 2012. La ciencia bajo fuego. Investigación científica, universidad y poder político en Chile, 1967-1973. Santiago: Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile.
Santélices B. 2015. Investigación científica universitaria en Chile. In: A. Bernasconi (ed), La educación superior en Chile. Transformación, desarrollo y crisis. Santiago: Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile. pp: 409–445.
Sarno R, Caruso P. 1996. L’agronomia del territorio: il ruolo delle scienze agronomiche nella formazione professionale. Rivista di Agronomía, 30, 297–309.
Thorpe P, Pardey PG. 1990. The generation and transfer of agricultural knowledge: A bibliometric study of a research network. Journal of Information Science, 16(3), 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555159001600306
Valdés A, Foster W. 2005. Externalidades de la agricultura chilena. Santiago: Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Patricio Andrés Padilla Navarro, Arturo Vallejos Romero
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
- The authors retain the copyright and transfer to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work registered with the Creative Commons attribution license, which allows third parties to use what is published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this magazine.
- Authors may make other independent and additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work It was first published in this magazine.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (for example on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and greater and faster dissemination of the work. published (see The Effect of Open Access).
