Community participatory planning as a methodological tool for the conformation of rural collective subjects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22231/asyd.v18i1.1429Keywords:
research-action; producers’ organization; rural subjects; social capitalAbstract
This article presents the results derived from the execution of a research-action project under the method of diagnosis and community participatory planning, performed in 17 rural communities of four states in the Mexican Republic. The general objective of the project consisted in performing participatory diagnoses that could lead to the elaboration of integral community development plans, conceived as tools for planning and conducting local development. Among the results reached, the following stand out: high degree of appropriation of the methodology by the participants, identification of common problems and discovery of underlying potentialities, such as: the existence of abundant natural resources and installed productive infrastructure, the prevalence of practices of voluntary and unpaid collective work, and various components of social capital in latent state. Based on this, it is possible to conclude that the methodology used contributes to the configuration of collective rural subjects with a project of their own and that, therefore, the communities that have participated are now better trained, from the organizational point of view, to retain the population in their places of origin and to avoid falling into the tragedy of the commons.
References
Chambers, Robert. 1997. Whose Reality Counts? Putting the First Last, London, ITDG.
Chevalier, Jaques, and Buckles, Daniel. 2009. SAS2 Guía para la Investigación Colaborativa y la Movilización Social, Ottawa, http://web.idrc.ca/openebooks/419-2/, consultado el 9 de julio de 2016.
CONAFOR (Comisión Nacional Forestal). 2014. Diagnóstico Participativo. Métodos e instrumentos para realizar el diagnóstico participativo comunitario, México, Secretaría del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales.
FAO (Organización para la Alimentación y la Agricultura). 2008. Diagnóstico Rural Participativo y Planificación Comunitaria, Managua, FAO and NSFOP/UNICAM.
García Batíz, María Luisa. 2006. Planeación participativa: La experiencia de la política ambiental en México, México, Plaza y Valdés.
Geilfus, Frans. 80 herramientas para el desarrollo participativo: diagnóstico, planificación, monitoreo, evaluación, México, IICA.
Hardin, Garrett. 1968. The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, New Series, Vol. 162, No. 3859, pp: 1243-1248.
Herwer, Karl and Steiner, Kurt. 2002. Monitoreo y valoración del impacto. Instrumentos a usar en proyectos de desarrollo rural con un enfoque en el manejo sostenible de la tierra, Volumen 1, Berna. http://www.bvsde.paho.org/bbsacd/CD11/monitoreo.pdf, consultado el 18 de septiembre de 2016.
Negrete Fernández, Gerardo, y Bocco Verdinelli, Gerardo. 2003. El ordenamiento ecológico comunitario: una alternativa de planeación participativa en el contexto de la política ambiental de México. In: Gaceta Ecológica, No. 68.
Osorio Rosales, María Luisa, y Contreras Hernández, Armando. 209. El diagnóstico rural participativo y el manejo de los recursos naturales. Revista Estudios Agrarios. Número 42, septiembre-diciembre. pp: 109-136.
Ostrom, Elinor. 2000. El gobierno de los bienes comunes, la evolución de las instituciones de acción colectiva, México, Fondo de Cultura económica. Traductoras: Corina Yturbe y Adriana Sandoval. 395 p.
Putnam, Robert. 1994. Para que la democracia funcione, Caracas, GALAC.
Quadri de la Torre, Gabriel. 2006. Políticas públicas: sustentabilidad y medio ambiente, México, Editorial Porrúa.
Terrones Cordero, Aníbal, y Sánchez Torres, Yolanda. 2010. Planeación participativa: Teoría y práctica, México, Plaza y Valdés-UAEH.
Terrones Cordero, Aníbal. 2013. Planeación participativa para elaborar un plan de desarrollo municipal: el caso de Acaxochitlán, Hidalgo. In: Economía, Sociedad y Territorio. Vol. 13, Núm. 42, mayo-agosto.
Tillmann, Hermann, y Salas, María. 1994. Nuestro Congreso: Manual de Diagnóstico Rural Participativo, Santiago de Puriscal, PRODAF-GTZ.
Touraine, Alain. 1984. Actores sociales y sistemas políticos en América Latina, Santiago de Chile, PREALC-OIT.
Verdejo, Miguel. 2003. Diagnóstico Rural Participativo. Una guía práctica, Santo Domingo. http://www.entremundos.org/databases/New%20Training%20Manuals/exposito-diagnostico-rural-participativo.pdf, consultado el 9 de septiembre de 2016.
Vidal, Gregorio. 2012. Actores sociales y gobiernos ante la crisis, México, Editorial Porrúa.
Zamora, Carla. 2011. Crisis rural, cambio climático y pobreza: hacia la búsqueda de alternativas para la definición de políticas públicas en México, México, Oxfam.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
- The authors retain the copyright and transfer to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work registered with the Creative Commons attribution license, which allows third parties to use what is published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this magazine.
- Authors may make other independent and additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work It was first published in this magazine.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (for example on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and greater and faster dissemination of the work. published (see The Effect of Open Access).
