Factors that influence access to agricultural and livestock extension in Peru: in search for more inclusive models

Authors

  • Christian Barrantes-Bravo Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina
  • Jesús Salinas-Flores Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina
  • J. Luis Yagüe-Blanco Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22231/asyd.v14i2.589

Keywords:

commercial agriculture, technical assistance, decentralization, small-scale farmers, privatization

Abstract

With the aim of evaluating the access to extension services in Peru, after the processes of privatization and decentralization which the country underwent, an analysis of the results of the National Agricultural and Livestock Census from 2012 was performed, using also a multivariate method (algorithm of classification tree – CHAID), with the objective of determining the profile of the producers who receive extension services in function of different predictive variables. It was found that 10.2 % of the agricultural and livestock producers in the country have access to extension services and that the most important provider of such services is the private sector. It was determined that an agricultural surface larger than 5 ha, associationism, and access to credit are the factors most frequently related with access to extension services, showing in the profile of the producer who receives extension work its connection to commercial agriculture. It is concluded that the changes stirred up by extension work in Peru have not managed to improve access to them, particularly at the level of small-scale producers, and also verifying with this the need for a change in approach which, strengthening new actors and using more flexible models, make it increasingly more inclusive.

References

Aguirre, Francisco. 2012. El nuevo impulso de la extensión rural en América Latina: Situación actual y perspectivas, Santiago de Chile: RELASER. 53 p.

Alemany, Carlos. 2008. Volvió la extensión… ¡y se armó la discusión! In: Thornton, Ricardo y Gustavo Cimadevilla (eds). Grises de la extensión, la comunicación y el desarrollo. Buenos Aires. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). pp: 27-50.

Al-Sharafat, Ali, Mohammad Altarawneh, and Ebraheem Altahat. Effectiveness of agricultural extension activities. 2012. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Vol. 7, Num. 2.

Birbaumer, Georg. 2011. Extensión, comunicación y desarrollo rural. Asunción: Deutsche Gesellschaft fuer Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ). 277 p.

Carrasco, Alfredo. 1990. Evaluación y propuesta de un sistema de extensión agropecuaria. Lima: Ministerio de Agricultura del Perú. 117 p.

Cuevas, Venancio, Julio Baca, Fernando Cervantes, y José Aguilar. 2012. Asistencia técnica en el sector agropecuario en México: análisis del VIII censo agropecuario y forestal. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas. Vol. 3, Num. 5.

Dethier, Jean-Jacques, and Alexandra Effenberger. 2012. Agriculture and development: A brief review of the literature. Economic Systems. Vol. 36, Num. 2.

Eguren, Fernando. 2006. La reforma agraria y el desarrollo rural en la región andina. Lima. CEPES. 335 p.

Escobar, Mercado. 2007. El análisis de segmentación: Técnicas y aplicaciones de los árboles de clasificación. Colección cuadernos metodológicos. Madrid. Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (CIS). 239 p.

Feder Gershon, Anderson, R. Jock, Regina Birner, and Klaus Deininger. 2010. Promises and realities of community-based agricultural extension, Washington DC: IFPRI. 23 p.

Hellin, Jon. 2012. Agricultural extension, collective action and innovation systems: Lessons on network brokering from Peru and Mexico. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension. Vol. 18, Num. 2.

Hellin, Jon, and John Dixon. 2008. Operationalising participatory research and farmer-to-farmer extension: the Kamayoq in Peru. Development in Practice. Vol. 18, Num 4.

Ho, Raúl, y Roberto Montero. 2014. Extensión rural y asistencia técnica en el sector campesino: Experiencias del periodo 1997-2013. Lecciones aprendidas, Lima: Soluciones Prácticas. 101 p.

Hu, Ruifa, Yaqing Cai, Kevin Z. Chen, and Jikun Huang. 2012. Effects of inclusive public agricultural extension service: Results from a policy reform experiment in western China. China Economic Review. Vol. 23, Num. 4.

Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática. I2013. V censo nacional agropecuario. REDATAM. Sistema de consulta de datos, Versión 1.0. In: http://censos.inei.gob.pe/Cenagro/ redatam.

Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática. 1994. III censo nacional agropecuario. Sistema de consulta de resultados censales. In: http://censos.inei.gob.pe/bcoCuadros/IIIcenagro.htm.

Kidd, Andrew, John Lamers, Pier Ficarelli, and Volker Hoffmann. 2000. Privatising agricultural extension: caveat emptor. Journal of Rural Studies. Vol. 16, Num. 1.

Labarthe, Pierre, and Catherine Laurent. 2013. Privatization of agricultural extension services in EU: Towards a lack of adecuate knowledge for small-scale farms? Food Policy 38. Vol. 38.

McMahon, Matthew, y Alberto Valdés. 2011. Análisis del extensionismo agrícola en México. París. Organización para la cooperación y el desarrollo económicos. 73 p.

Mora, Jorge. 2002. Desarrollo rural, cambio Institucional y extensión rural en Centroamérica y México. San José de Costa Rica. Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura (IICA). 59 p.

Ortiz, Oscar. 2006. Evolution of agricultural extension and information dissemination in Peru: An historical perspective focusing on potato-related pest control. Agriculture and Human Values. Vol. 23, Num. 4.

Pye-Smith, Charlie. 2

Published

2017-07-20

How to Cite

Barrantes-Bravo, C., Salinas-Flores, J., & Yagüe-Blanco, J. L. (2017). Factors that influence access to agricultural and livestock extension in Peru: in search for more inclusive models. Agricultura, Sociedad Y Desarrollo, 14(2), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.22231/asyd.v14i2.589