Knowledge co-production in bee studies in latin american coffee agroecosystems: a meta-narrative review.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22231/asyd.v22i4.1758Keywords:
agroforestry systems, Apoidea, Coffea arabica, pollinators, transdisciplinary researchAbstract
Knowledge co-production is key to designing strategies for the use and conservation of pollinators relevant to local contexts. However, the inclusion of diverse actors in research processes does not guarantee a real integration of knowledge. This study analyzes how local knowledge has been incorporated in research on bees in coffee agroecosystems in Latin America. Through a meta-narrative review of studies published between 1993 and 2022, the participation of non-academic actors was evaluated from a transdisciplinary research approach (TDR). The results indicate that, although 63.5% of the studies reviewed in depth involve producers, there is scarce collaborative definition of problems, joint methodological construction, or return of results. Four types of studies were identified according to their objectives: those that describe biotic elements of the coffee-bee system (48.6%), those that analyze beekeeping management practices (31.1%), those that address socioecological connectivity (6.8%), and those that systematize non-academic perceptions of pollinators (13.5%). The review highlights the need to strengthen the processes of knowledge co-production through the explicitness of accessible theoretical and methodological bases, the creation of spaces for horizontal exchange, and the active participation of peasant organizations and other non-academic actors. Overall, the findings offer an overview of the current state of research and underscore the need for more collaborative, inclusive and contextualized approaches to address sustainability challenges in Latin American coffee agroecosystems.
References
Aldasoro M, Rodriguez U, Van der H, Morales H, Ferguson B, Rayas J, Martínez ML, Avilez T. 2019. 1er congreso de Agroecología. Explorando una Agroecología Pedantropológica: Meliponicultura talleres agroecológicos y huertos escolares en Tabasco. El Colegio de la Frontera Sur.
Anderzén J, Guzmán A, Luna-González DV, Merrill SC, Caswell M, Méndez VE, Hernández R, Mier y Terán M. 2020. Effects of on-farm diversification strategies on smallholder coffee farmer food security and income sufficiency in Chiapas Mexico. Journal of Rural Studies. 77. 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.04.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.04.001
Arnold N, Zepeda R, Vásquez M, Aldasoro M. 2018. Las abejas sin aguijón y su cultivo en Oaxaca, México: Con catálogo de especies. El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, CONABIO: México, https://www.ecosur.mx/libros/producto/las-abejas-sin-agujon-y-su-cultivo-en-oaxacamexico-con-catalogo-de-especies/. 193 p.
Bartomeus I, Dicks LV. 2019. The need for coordinated transdisciplinary research infrastructures for pollinator conservation and crop pollination resilience. Environmental Research Letters, 14(4). 045017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab0cb5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab0cb5
Bathfield B, Gasselin P, López‐Ridaura S, Vandame R. 2013. A flexibility framework to understand the adaptation of small coffee and honey producers facing market shocks. The Geographical Journal, 179(4). 356-368. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12004
Caniglia G, Freeth R, Luederitz C, Leventon J, West SP, John B, Peukert D, Lang DJ, Von Wehrden H, Martín-López B, Fazey I, Russo F, Von Wirth T, Schlüter M, Vogel C. 2023. Practical wisdom and virtue ethics for knowledge co-production in sustainability science. Nature Sustainability 6(5). 493-501. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-01040-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-01040-1
Centeno-Alvarado D, Lopes AV, Arnan X. 2023. Fostering pollination through agroforestry: A global review. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 351. 108478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2023.108478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2023.108478
Cepeda-Valencia J, Gómez PD, Nicholls C. 2014. La estructura importa: Abejas visitantes del café y estructura agroecológica principal (EAP) en cafetales. Revista Colombiana de Entomología, 40(2). 241-250. http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/rcen/v40n2/v40n2a18.pdf.
Cerdán CR, Rebolledo MC, Soto G, Rapidel B, Sinclair FL 2012. Local knowledge of impacts of tree cover on ecosystem services in smallholder coffee production systems. Agricultural Systems, 110. 119-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.03.014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.03.014
Cerdán CR 2012. Local knowledge regarding trade-offs among coffee productivity and other ecosystem services in a range of different agroforestry systems in Central America. Tesis de doctorado. CATIE y Bangor University. Costa Rica. https://repositorio.catie.ac.cr/handle/11554/5301
Chain-Guadarrama A, Martínez-Salinas A, Aristizábal N, Ricketts TH. 2019. Ecosystem services by birds and bees to coffee in a changing climate: A review of coffee berry borer control and pollination. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 280. 53-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.04.011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.04.011
Chambers JM, Wyborn C, Ryan ME, Reid RS, Riechers M, Serban A, Bennett NJ, Cvitanovic C, Fernández-Giménez ME, Galvin KA, Goldstein BE, Klenk NL, Tengö M, Brennan R, Cockburn JJ, Hill R, Munera C, Nel JL, Österblom H, Pickering T. 2021. Six modes of co-production for sustainability. Nature Sustainability. 4. 983-996. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00755-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00755-x
Chambers JM, Wyborn C, Klenk NL, Ryan M, Serban A, Bennett NJ, Brennan R, Charli-Joseph L, Fernández-Giménez ME, Galvin KA, Goldstein BE, Haller T, Hill R, Munera C, Nel JL, Österblom H, Reid RS, Riechers M, Spierenburg M, Rondeau R. 2022. Co-productive agility and four collaborative pathways to sustainability transformations. Global Environmental Change. 72. 102422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102422
Delfin Y. 2011. Contribución de organizaciones de productores a la sustentabilidad de sus territorios, Guaya’b (Guatemala) y Maya Vinic (Chiapas). Tesis de maestría. El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, México. https://ecosur.repositorioinstitucional.mx/jspui/handle/1017/1667
Delgado F y Rist S (eds). 2016. Ciencias, diálogo de saberes y transdisciplinariedad. Aportes teórico metodológicos para la sustentabilidad alimentaria y del desarrollo. Plural editores: Bolivia, https://redglocal.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Delgado-y-Rist-Ciencias-dialogo-de-saberes1_compressed.pdf. 377 p.
Dicks LV, Breeze TD, Ngo HT, Senapathi D, An J, Aizen MA, Basu P, Buchori D, Galetto L, Garibaldi LA, Gemmill-Herren B, Howlett BG, Imperatriz-Fonseca VL, Johnson SD, Kovács-Hostyánszki A, Kwon YJ, Lattorff HMG, Lungharwo T, Seymour CL, Potts SG. 2021. A global-scale expert assessment of drivers and risks associated with pollinator decline. Nature Ecology & Evolution 5. 1453-1461. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01534-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01534-9
Galbraith SM, Hall TE, Tavárez HS, Kooistra CM, Ordoñez JC & Bosque-Pérez NA. 2017. Local ecological knowledge reveals effects of policy-driven land use and cover change on beekeepers in Costa Rica. Land Use Policy, 69. 112-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.08.032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.08.032
Galetto L, Aizen MA, Del Coro M, Freitas BM, Garibaldi LA, Giannini TC, Lopes AV, Do Espírito Santo MM, Maués MM, Nates-Parra G, Rodríguez JI, Quezada-Euán JJG, Vandame R, Viana BF, Imperatriz-Fonseca VL. 2022. Risks and opportunities associated with pollinators’ conservation and management of pollination services in Latin America. Ecología Austral, 32(1). 055-076. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.22.32.1.0.1790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.22.32.1.0.1790
Gemmill-Herren B, Garibaldi LA, Kremen C, Ngo HT. 2021. Building effective policies to conserve pollinators: Translating knowledge into policy. Current Opinion in Insect Science, 46. 64-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2021.02.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2021.02.012
González-Chaves A, Jaffé R, Metzger JP, De M P Kleinert A. 2020. Forest proximity rather than local forest cover affects bee diversity and coffee pollination services. Landscape Ecology, 35. 1841-1855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01061-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01061-1
Harvey CA, Pritts AA, Zwetsloot MJ, Jansen K, Pulleman MM, Armbrecht I, Avelino J, Barrera JF, Bunn C, Hoyos J, Isaza C, Munoz-Ucros J, Pérez-Alemán CJ, Rahn E, Robiglio V, Somarriba E, Valencia V. 2021. Transformation of coffee-growing landscapes across Latin America. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 41. 62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-021-00712-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-021-00712-0
Hill R, Nates-Parra G, Quezada-Euán JJG, Buchori D, LeBuhn G, Maués MM, Pert PL, Kwapong PK, Saeed S, Breslow SJ, Carneiro da Cunha M, Dicks LV, Galetto L, Gikungu M, Howlett BG, Imperatriz-Fonseca VL, O’B Lyver P, Martín-López B, Oteros-Rozas E, Roué M. 2019. Biocultural approaches to pollinator conservation. Nature Sustainability, 2. 214-222. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0244-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0244-z
IPBES. Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. 2016. The assessment report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services on pollinators, pollination and food production. Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Bonn, Alemania, https://files.ipbes.net/ipbes-web-prod-public-files/spm_deliverable_3a_pollination_20170222.pdf. pp. 36.
Lang DJ, Wiek A, Bergmann M, Stauffacher M, Martens P, Moll P, Swilling M, Thomas CJ. 2012. Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: Practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science, 7(S1). 25-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x
Lara A. 2021. Apropiación de la meliponicultura en comunidades nahuas de la Sierra de Zongolica, Veracruz. Tesis de Licenciatura. Instituto Tecnológico Superior de Zongolica. México.
Latulippe N, Klenk N. 2020. Making room and moving over: Knowledge co-production, Indigenous knowledge sovereignty and the politics of global environmental change decisionmaking. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 42. 7-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.10.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.10.010
Lokot M, Wake C. 2023. NGO–academia research co‐production in humanitarian settings: Opportunities and challenges. Disasters, 47(2). 464-481. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12556
López G. 2019. Ser y Estar bien campesino, un reto para las Organizaciones. Tesis de maestría. El Colegio de la Frontera Sur. México. https://ecosur.repositorioinstitucional.mx/jspui/bitstream/1017/2508/1/36271_Documento.pdf.
Luiza B. 2020. La conectividad funcional y los servicios ecosistémicos proporcionados por abejas en los agropaisajes del Corredor Biológico Volcánica Central Talamanca, Costa Rica. Tesis de Máster. CATIE, Costa Rica. https://repositorio.catie.ac.cr/handle/11554/9856.
Luna Y, Aldasoro EM, Vides E, Morales H, Rosset P. 2022. Crianza de abejas nativas: Una pedagogía agroecológica con raíces. Revista Brasileira de Educação do Campo, 7. 1-27. https://doi.org/10.20873/uft.rbec.e14508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20873/uft.rbec.e14508
Maderson S. 2023. Co-producing agricultural policy with beekeepers: Obstacles and opportunities. Land Use Policy, 128. 106603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106603
Magrach A, Champetier A, Krishnan S, Boreux V, Ghazoul J. 2019. Uncertainties in the value and opportunity costs of pollination services. Journal of Applied Ecology, 56(7). 1549-1559. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13399
Malmer P, Tengö M (eds), Fernández-Llamazares A, Woodward E, Crawhall N, Hill R, Trakansuphakon P, Athayde S, Cariño C, Crimella D, Farhan M, Pérez E, Spencer R, Trakansuphakon N, Bicksler A, Cariño J, Gonzalo E, Lengoisa J, Lungharwo T, Tahi B. 2019. Dialogue across Indigenous, local and scientific knowledge systems reflecting on the IPBES Assessment on Pollinators, Pollination and Food Production, 21th to 25th January 2019, Chiang Mai and Chiang Rai, Thailand. Workshop report. SwedBio at Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm: Sweden, https://swed.bio/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/7017-0033-SRC-Report-Pollinators-dialouge_WEB.pdf. 76 p.
Marques MF, Hautequestt AP, Oliveira UB, Manhães-Tavares VF, Perkles OR, Zappes CA & Gaglianone MC. 2017. Local knowledge on native bees and their role as pollinators in agricultural communities. Journal of Insect Conservation, 21. 345-356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-017-9981-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-017-9981-3
Martínez-Fortún MS. 2015. Desarrollo sostenible y conservación etnoecológica a través de la meliponicultura, en el sur de Ecuador. Tesis de Máster. Universidad Internacional de Andalucía, España. https://dspace.unia.es/handle/10334/3519.
Martínez LC 2020. Estrategia cultural para la conservación y producción de abejas (Apis mellifera) en el sector Porvenir Las Rositas del municipio de Arbeláez. Tesis de Licenciatura en zootecnia. Universidad de Cundinamarca, Colombia. https://repositorio.ucundinamarca.edu.co/handle/20.500.12558/3476.
Martínez LR 2021. Abejas silvestres en cafetales de sombra: Una visión ecológica y campesina. Tesis de Maestría en Ciencias. Instituto de Ecología. Méndez VE, Bacon CM, Olson M, Morris KS, Shattuck A. 2010. Agrobiodiversity and Shade Coffee Smallholder Livelihoods: A Review and Synthesis of Ten Years of Research in Central America. The Professional Geographer, 62(3). 357-376. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2010.483638. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2010.483638
Merçon J (Ed.). 2021. Investigación transdisciplinaria e investigación-acción participativa: Conocimiento y acción para la transformación. Vol. 2. CopIt-arXives, Conacyt e Instituto de Física de la UNAM: México, https://copitarxives.fisica.unam.mx/SC0008ES/SC0008ES.pdf. pp. 201.
Miller CA, Wyborn C. 2020. Co-production in global sustainability: Histories and theories. Environmental Science & Policy, 113. 88-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.01.016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.01.016
Moreaux C, Meireles DAL, Sonne J, Badano EI, Classen A, González-Chaves A, Hipólito J, Klein AM, Maruyama PK, Metzger JP, Philpott SM, Rahbek C, Saturni FT, Sritongchuay T, Tscharntke T, Uno S, Vergara CH, Viana BF, Strange N, Dalsgaard B. 2022. The value of biotic pollination and dense forest for fruit set of Arabica coffee: A global assessment. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 323. 107680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107680. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107680
Ngo HT, Mojica AC, Packer L. 2011. Coffee plant – pollinator interactions: A review. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 89(8). 647-660. https://doi.org/10.1139/z11-028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/z11-028
Norström AV, Cvitanovic C, Löf MF, West S, Wyborn C, Balvanera P, Bednarek AT, Bennett EM, Biggs R, de Bremond A, Campbell BM, Canadell JG, Carpenter SR, Folke C, Fulton EA, Gaffney O, Gelcich S, Jouffray JB, Leach M, Österblom H. 2020. Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research. Nature Sustainability, 3. 182-190. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2
Osterman J, Landaverde-González P, Garratt MPD, Gee M, Mandelik Y, Langowska A, Miñarro M, Cole LJ, Eeraerts M, Bevk D, Avrech O, Koltowski Z, Trujillo-Elisea FI, Paxton RJ, Boreux V, Seymour CL, Howlett BG. 2021. On-farm experiences shape farmer knowledge perceptions of pollinators and management practices. Global Ecology and Conservation, 32.e01949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01949. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01949
Palomo-Campesino S, González JA, García-Llorente M. 2018. Exploring the Connections between Agroecological Practices and Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 10(12). 4339. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124339
Pascual U, Balvanera P, Anderson CB, Chaplin-Kramer R, Christie M, González-Jiménez D, Martin A, Raymond CM, Termansen M, Vatn A, Athayde S, Baptiste B, Barton DN, Jacobs S, Kelemen E, Kumar R, Lazos E, Mwampamba TH, Nakangu B, Zent E. 2023. Diverse values of nature for sustainability. Nature, 620. 813-823. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06406-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06406-9
Perfecto I, Vandermeer JH. 2015. Coffee agroecology: A new approach to understanding agricultural biodiversity, ecosystem services and sustainable development. Routledge Eartscan: London, https://archive.org/details/coffeeagroecolog0000perf. 336 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203526712
Pohl C, Klein JT, Hoffmann S, Mitchell C, Fam D. 2021. Conceptualising transdisciplinary integration as a multidimensional interactive process. Environmental Science & Policy, 118. 18-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.12.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.12.005
Quezada-Euán JJG, Nates-Parra G, Maués MM, Roubik DW, Imperatriz-Fonseca VL. 2018. The economic and cultural values of stingless bees (Hymenoptera: Meliponini) among ethnic groups of tropical America. Sociobiology, 65(4). 534-557. https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v65i4.3447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v65i4.3447
Ramos S. 2019. Árboles de sombra y abejas nativas en cafetales con manejo agroecológico en Amatlán de los Reyes e Ixhuatlán del Café, Veracruz. Tesis de maestría. Colegio de Postgraduados, México. https://vidaycafe.org/wp-content/uploads/2019_Tesis_Arboles-Abejas-Nativas-Cafetal-Agroecologico.pdf.
Rawluk A, Saunders ME. 2019. Facing the gap: Exploring research on local knowledge of insectprovided services in agroecosystems. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 17(1). 108-117. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2019.1567244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2019.1567244
Reed MS, Vella S, Challies E, De Vente J, Frewer L, Hohenwallner-Ries D, Huber T, Neumann RK, Oughton EA, Sidoli J, Van Delden H. 2018. A theory of participation: What makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work? Restoration Ecology, 26(S1). 7-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12541. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12541
Requier F, Pérez-Méndez N, Andersson GKS, Blareau E, Merle I, Garibaldi LA. 2023. Bee and non-bee pollinator importance for local food security. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 38(2). 196-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2022.10.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2022.10.006
Restrepo JC. 2020. Relatos que emergen en un grupo de estudiantes cuando indaga acerca de la disminución de los polinizadores: Un espacio pedagógico construido desde la ética en-acción. Tesis de Maestría. Universidad de Antioquia, Colombia. https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/handle/10495/16152.
Reyes-González A, Camou-Guerrero A, Reyes-Salas O, Argueta A, Casas A. 2014. Diversity, local knowledge and use of stingless bees (Apidae: Meliponini) in the municipality of Nocupétaro, Michoacan, Mexico. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 10. 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-10-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-10-47
Roubik DW. 2002. The value of bees to the coffee harvest. Nature, 417. 708. https://doi.org/10.1038/417708a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/417708a
Schneider F, Tribaldos T, Adler C, Biggs R, De Bremond A, Buser T, Krug C, Loutre MF, Moore S, Norström AV, Paulavets K, Urbach D, Spehn E, Wülser G, Zondervan R. 2021. Coproduction of knowledge and sustainability transformations: A strategic compass for global research networks. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 49. 127-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2021.04.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2021.04.007
Scholz RW, Steiner G. 2015. The real type and ideal type of transdisciplinary processes: Part I—theoretical foundations. Sustainability Science, 10. 527-544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0326-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0326-4
Serafín-Castro AM, Cortina-Villar S, Monzón-Alvarado C, Segura-Pacheco HR. 2021. ¿Favorecen los pagos por servicios ambientales el mantenimiento de las huertas cafetaleras? Evidencia del Ejido de San Vicente de Benítez, Guerrero, México. Estudios Sociales. Revista de Alimentación Contemporánea y Desarrollo Regional, 31(58). 1-26. https://doi.org/10.24836/es.v31i58.1152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24836/es.v31i58.1152
Snyder H. 2019. Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104. 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Toledo VM, Barrera-Bassols N. 2008. La memoria biocultural: La importancia ecológica de la sabidurías tradicionales. Icaria Editorial: Barcelona, España, https://www.uv.mx/orizaba/mgas/files/2016/03/memoria-biocultural.pdf. 230 p.
Toledo V, Barrera-Bassols N. 2017. Political Agroecology in Mexico: A Path toward Sustainability. Sustainability, 9(2). 268. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020268
Turnhout E, Metze T, Wyborn C, Klenk N, Louder E. 2020. The politics of co-production: Participation, power, and transformation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 42. 15-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.11.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.11.009
Vilsmaier U, Brandner V, Engbers M. 2017. Research In-between: The Constitutive Role of Cultural Differences in Transdisciplinarity. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 8: 169-179. https://doi.org/10.22545/2017/00093. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22545/2017/00093
Vinci G, Rapa M, Roscioli F. 2018. Sustainable Development in Rural Areas of Mexico through Beekeeping. International Journal of Science and Engineering Invention, 4(6). 1-7. https://doi.org/10.23958/ijsei/vol04-i08/01. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23958/ijsei/vol04-i08/01
Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Buckingham J, Pawson R. 2013. RAMESES publication standards: Meta-narrative reviews. BMC Medicine, 11. 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-20
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Gabriela García Esqueda, Andrés Camou Guerrero, Juliana Merçon, Luciana Porter Bolland, Jaime Paneque-Gálvez, Alejandro Reyes González
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
- The authors retain the copyright and transfer to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work registered with the Creative Commons attribution license, which allows third parties to use what is published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this magazine.
- Authors may make other independent and additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work It was first published in this magazine.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (for example on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and greater and faster dissemination of the work. published (see The Effect of Open Access).
