Adoption of vermiculture among indigenous women of Oaxaca’s high Mixtec region, México
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22231/asyd.v14i2.593Keywords:
subsistence agriculture, indigenous communities, organic residuesAbstract
In 2007 and 2008, 74 indigenous women from six Mixtec communities in the District of Nochixtlán, Oaxaca, were trained in the preparation and use of vermiculture. In 2010 and 2011, a survey was applied to the participating women with the objective of determining the effect of the technological, economic, social and cultural factors on the adoption of vermiculture. The data were analyzed through correlations and multiple regression. The results revealed that 100 % of the women adopted vermiculture, 89.2 % at a high level, 10.8 % at a medium level, and none at the low level. The factors that correlated to Adoption were, from the technological ones, Knowledge of technology (r=0.59) and Relevance of technology (r=0.24); from the social ones, Age (r=–0.53) and Schooling (r=0.45); and from the cultural ones, Language (r=0.41). In the multiple regression model, only Knowledge of technology, Age and Schooling showed that they were defining factors in the Adoption of vermiculture. It is concluded that the training course and economic backing granted were efficient in teaching the vermiculture technique to participating women. It is suggested to have a translator in the local language to improve the teaching.References
Aguilar Rivera, Noé, e Hilario Ortiz Romero. 2004. Generación, Adopción y Transferencia de Tecnología, Retos del Desarrollo Sustentable en el Agro Mexicano. Estudios Agrarios 26:95-119.
Aski, S. G., and L. V. Hirevenkanagoudar. 2010. Extent of adoption of vermicompost practices by the KVK trained framers. Asian Sciences 5 (2): 85-88.
Calderón Fabián, Pablo Eduardo, Francisco Martínez Rodrí- guez, y Jesús Armando Ruiz Careaga. 2003. Manual para la producción y uso de humus de lombriz. Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, México., Instituto de Suelos, Ministerio de la Agricultura, Cuba. 1ra. Edición. pp: 11-84.
CIMMYT (Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz y Trigo). 1993. Programa de Economía del CIMMYT. La adopción de tecnologías agrícolas: Guía para el diseño de encuestas. México, D.F. pp: 1-41.
Colomer Mendoza, Francisco José, y Antonio Gallardo Izquierdo. 2007. Tratamiento y Gestión de Residuos Sólidos. Universidad Politécnica de Valencia. LIMUSA. Primera Edición. 328 p.
De Schutter, Anton. 1986. Extensión y Capacitación Rurales. Ed. Trillas. México, D.F. 122 p.
Del Toro Romo, María, y Fernando Limón Aguirre. 2011. Experiencia colectiva de mujeres en torno a un proyecto de lombricultura en Tziscao, Chiapas. Temas Antropológicos. Revista Científica de investigaciones Regionales. 33(2):97:122.
Feder, Gershon, and Diana L. Umali. 1993. The adoption of agricultural innovations. A review. Technological Forecast and Social Change. 43:215-239.
Feder, Gershon, Richard E. Just, and David Zilberman. 1998. Adoption of Agricultural Innovation in Developing Countries: A survey. World Bank staff working papers Number 542. The World Bank. Washington, D.C., U.S.A. 70 p.
Frausto, Jorge, y Carlos Ortiz, Solorio. 1986. Levantamiento fisiográfico del Distrito Político de Nochixtlán, Oax. Circulación interna. Plan Nochixtlán. CEICADAR. Colegio de Postgraduados. Nochixtlán, Oaxaca. 304 p.
Galindo González, Guillermo, Héctor Pérez Trujillo, Cuauhté- moc López Mendiola, y Agustín Robles Martínez. 2002. Estrategia comunicativa en el medio rural zacatecano para transferir innovaciones agrícolas. Terra Latinoamericana 19:393-398.
García, Enriqueta. 1988. Modificaciones al sistema de clasificación climática de Köopen. Offset Larios S.A. México D.F. México. 127 p.
Gupta, Shruti, Tanuja Kushwah, and Shweta Yadav. 2014. Role of Earth worms in promoting sustainable agriculture. India International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 3(7):449-460.
Hiremath, Soujanya. S. 2013. A study on impact of training conducted on vermicompost production technology. International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production. 4(5): 1118-1121.
INEGI (Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informá- tica). 2010. Resultados definitivos VII Censo Agrícola Ganadero. INEGI. Oaxaca, México.
Kurwijila, R. V. 1981. Observations on the use of appropriate technology in agricultural development in Tanzania. Journal of tropical Agriculture and Veterinary 29:1.
Leeuwis, Cees. 2000. Reconceptualizing participation for sustainable rural development: towards a negotiation approach. Develop Change 31:931-959.
Martínez Cerdas, Claudia. 1995. Beneficios directos de la lombricultura. Parte 1. Boletín Divulgativo Agricultura Integral, A. C. Tepoztlán, Morelos.
Miranda, Faustino, y Efraín Hernández Xolocotzi. 1963. Los tipos de vegetación en México y su clasificación. Sobretiro del boletín No. 28 de la Sociedad Botánica de México. Chapingo, México. pp: 29-176.
Mosher, Arthur Theodore. 1979. An introduction to agricultural extension. Agricultural development council, Singapore University Press. 19 p.
Plan Nochixtlán. 1998. Informe 1989. Plan Nochixtlán. CEICADAR. Colegio de Postgraduados. Nochixtlán, Oaxaca, México. 79 p.
Rodríguez Hernández, Ramón, Manuel Othón Cobián Gómez, y José Filemón Solano, Valladares. 1987. Marco de referencia del sector agropecuario y forestal en la región Mixteca. In: Muñoz Orozco, Abel y Benjamín Dimas Chaves (coord) Memoria del seminario como aumentar la producción agropecuaria y forestal en la región Mixteca Alta Oaxaqueña. SARH, Gobierno del Estado de Oaxaca. Colegio de Postgraduados. Tultepec, Oaxaca, México. pp: 1-39.
Sigh, Karan, B. S. Bhimawat, and N. K. Punjabi. 2008. Adoption of vermiculture technology by tribal farmers in Udaipur district of Rajasthan. International Journal of Rural Studies 15(1):1-3.
Sunil, N. K., and Manjula, N. 2009. Impact of Krishi Vigyan Kendra training on adoption of vermicompost technology by participant farmers in north Karnataka. Agriculture Update. 4(1/2):48-50.
UACH (Universidad Autónoma Chapingo). 2006. Reciclaje de desechos orgánicos por medio de composta y lombricomposta. Oficina Editorial de Agroecología. DEIS en Agroecología. Segunda Edición. 50 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
- The authors retain the copyright and transfer to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work registered with the Creative Commons attribution license, which allows third parties to use what is published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this magazine.
- Authors may make other independent and additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work It was first published in this magazine.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (for example on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and greater and faster dissemination of the work. published (see The Effect of Open Access).









