Economic evaluation with real options: second generation bioethanol biorefinery in Veracruz, Mexico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22231/asyd.v17i3.1363Keywords:
second generation bioethanol; biorefinery; real optionsAbstract
First generation bioethanol production in Mexico could have disadvantages, since some prime materials would come from food crops such as maize and sugarcane, causing instability in prices and market shortage. Second generation bioethanol could be a good solution to have fuels that are less pollutant, in a sustainable manner. The objective of this study was to evaluate the economic feasibility, with real options, of a biorefinery that will produce bioethanol from sugarcane wastes, and which is supposed to be located next to the largest sugar factory in the state of Veracruz. It is estimated that the biorefinery will have an annual capacity of 143 million liters and a total investment for the project of 308 million dollars. The real option of abandoning the project was used, for 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 years, and traditional evaluation for 30 years. The results indicate that the biorefinery would have a net present value of 27.3 million dollars until year 20, and a net present value of 61.1 million dollars for year 30. The price of bioethanol is the variable that affects most the profitability of a biorefinery of this type.
References
BANCOMEXT (Banco de Comercio Exterior). 2007. Industrial Cost in México. México, D. F. 157-175 p.
BANXICO (Banco de México). 2016. Serie histórica diaria del tipo de cambio peso-dólar. http://www.banxico.org.mx/.
Behrens, W., y Hawranek, P. M.1991. Manual for the preparation of industrial feasibility studies. United Nations Industrial Development Organization. New York. USA. 13 p.
Brambila, J. J. M., Martínez A., M. Rojas M., M. Pérez R., y V. Pérez. 2013. La bioeconomia, las biorefinerías y las opciones reales: El caso del biobioetanol y el azúcar real. Agrociencia. Vol.47, Num.3) pp: 281-292.
CFE. 2014. Consulta tu tarifa. http://app.cfe.gob.mx/Aplicaciones/CCFE/Tarifas/Tarifas/tarifas_negocio.asp.
CONADESUCA (Comité Nacional para el Desarrollo Sustentable de la Caña de Azúcar). 2015. Balance Mensual de Azúcar. México. DF. http://www.infocana.gob.mx.1
CONAGUA (Comisión Nacional del Agua). 2014. Ley Federal de Derechos. Disposiciones aplicables en materias de aguas nacionales. Comisión Nacional del Agua. México. DF.
DOE (Deparment of Energy). 2015. Lignocellulosic biomass for advanced biofuels and bioproducts. Office of Biological and Environmental Research. United States. Febrero 2015. 5 p.
DOF (Diario Oficial de la Federación). 2008. Ley de Promoción y Desarrollo de los Bioenergéticos. Publicada el 1 de febrero de 2008. Cámara de Diputados del H. Congreso de la Unión.México. DF.
DOF (Diario Oficial de la Federación). 2017. Modificación a la Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM 016 CRE-2016. CRE (Comisión Reguladora de Energía). http://www.dof.gob.mx.
Domínguez, C. A. 2008. Un análisis económico costo-beneficio del bioetanol en México. Tesis de Maestría en Economía Aplicada. El Colegio de la Frontera Norte. Tijuana, B.C., México 149 p. http://www.colef.mx/posgrado.
EBTP (European Biofuels Technology Platform). 2016. Demonstration and flagship projects on cellulosic ethanol. http://biofuelstp.eu/cellulosic-ethanol.html#crescentino.
EEA (European Environment Agency). 2008. Annual European Community Greenhouse Gas Inventory 1990–2006 and Inventory Report Brussels, Belgium. http://www.eea.europa.eu/
Fleten, S. E., Boomsa, T. K. y Meade, N. 2012. Renewable energy investments under different support schemes: A real option approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 220: 225–237.
Hodson W. 1996. Maynard manual del ingeniero industrial. Tomo III. Cuarta Edición. Edit. McGraw Hill.
Humbird, D., R. Davis, L. Tao, C. Kinchin, D. Hsu, A. Aden, P. Schoen, J. Lukas, B. Olthof, M. Worley, D. Sexton, and D. Dudgeon. 2011. Process Design and Economics for Biochemical Conversion of Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol. Technical Report NREL/TP-5100-47764. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401. http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy11osti/47764.pdf
IEA (International Energy Agency). 2010. Sustainable Production of Second Generation Biofuels. Paris, France. https://www.iea.org/publications.
IEA (International Energy Agency). 2014. CO2 emissions from fuels combustion highlights. Paris, France. https://www.iea.org/publications.
INEGI (Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática). 2015. Banco de Información Económica. Indicadores Internacionales. Tasa de Inflación. Estados Unidos. http://www.inegi.org.mx/sistemas/bie/.
Leduc S. 2009. Development of an optimization model for the location of biofuel Production plants. Doctoral Thesis. Division of Energy Engineering Department of Applied Physics and Mechanical Engineering. Lulea University of Technology. Sweden. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.471.8961&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Masera, R.O., J. Aguilón, y B. Gamino. 2005. Estimación del recurso y prospectiva tecnológica de la biomasa como energético renovable en México. Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas UNAM e Instituto de Ingeniería UNAM. Ciudad Universitaria. México. DF. http://portal.energia.gob.mx/webSener/res/168/A2_Biomasa.pdf
Maung, T. and Gustafson, C. (2011). The economic feasibility of sugar beet biofuel production in Central North Dakota. Biomass & Bioenergy 35:3737-3747.
Mohrn, A., and S. Raman. 2013. Lessons from first generation biofuels and implications for the sustainability appraisal of second generation biofuels. Energy Policy 63: 114–122.
Mun, J. 2002. Real Options Analysis: tools and techniques for valuing strategic investments and decisions. Wiley finance series. USA. pp: 143-145, 171.
PEMEX (Petróleos Mexicanos). 2015a. Resultados de licitación para adquisición de bioetanol anhidro. Mexicanos. Boletín de prensa núm. 24. 19/03/2015. www.pemex.com.
PEMEX (Petróleos Mexicanos). 2015b. Anuario Estadístico 2014. México, DF. www.pemex.com
REN21. 2017. Renewables 2017 Global Status Report. Paris: REN21 Secretariat. Paris. France. http://www.ren21.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/17-8399_GSR_2017_Full_Report_0621_Opt.pdf.
Ruiz, H.A., A. Martínez, and W. Vermerris. 2016. Bioenergy Potential, Energy Crops, and Biofuel Production in Mexico. Bioenergy and Research 9:981–984
Salgado-García, S.; Aranda-Ibáñez, E; Castelán-Estrada, M.; Ortiz-Laurel, H.; Palma-López, D y Córdova-Sánchez, S. 2014. Qué hacer con la paja de la cosecha mecanizada de la caña de azúcar. Revista AgroProductividad. 7:2.
Salvo, A., and F. M. Geiger. 2014. Reductions in local ozone levels in urban São Paulo due to a shift from ethanol to gasoline use, Nature Geoscience. 43: 4247–4252.
Seabra, J. E. A., L.T. Chum, and I. H. Macedo. 2010. A techno economic evaluation of the effects of centralized cellulosic ethanol and co-products refinery options with sugarcane mill clustering. Biomass and Bioenergy 34:1065–1078.
Seabra, J. E . A., and Macedo I. C. 2011. Comparative analysis for power generation and bioetanol production from sugarcane residual biomass in Brazil. Energy Policy. 39: 421-428.
SEMARNAT (Secretaria del Medio Ambiente Recursos Naturales). 2016. Informe de la situación del medio ambiente en México 2015. México, D.F. https://www.gob.mx/cms/ uploads/attachment/file/314954/Situacion_CC_completo_2015.pdf
SENER (Secretaria de Economía). 2006. Potenciales y Viabilidad del Uso de Bioetanol y Biodiesel para el Transporte en México. México. http://idbdocs.iadb.org/wsdocs/getdocument.aspx?docnum=36898991
SENER (Secretaria de Energía). 2014. Análisis y propuesta para la Introducción de Bioetanol Anhidro en las gasolinas que comercializa PEMEX. México, DF. 69 p. http://www.bioenergeticos.gob.mx.
Sheinbaum Claudia, Ruíz Belizza, and Ozawa Leticia, 2011. Energy consumption and related CO2 emissions in five Latin American countries: Changes from 1990 to 2006 and perspectives. Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 3629-3638.
SIAP (Servicio de Información Agropecuaria y Pesquera). 2015. Anuario Estadístico de la Producción Agrícola. México, DF. http://www.siap.gob.mx.
UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development). 2012. Mexico’s agriculture development: Perspectives and outlook. New York. USA.
USDA (United States Deparment of Agriculture). 2016. www.ers.usda.gov/datafiles/US_Bioenergy/Prices/table14.xls
Wang, M., M. Wu, and H. Huo. 2007. Life-cycle energy and greenhouse gas emission impacts of different corn bioetanol plant types Environmental Research Letters. 2: 1-13.
WBA. 2017. Global Bioenergy Statistics 2017. World Bioenergy Association Stockholm, Sweden. https://worldbioenergy.org/uploads/WBA%20GBS%202017_hq.pdf
Weston, J. F., and Brigham, E. F. 1993. Fundamentos de Administración Financiera. Novena Edición. Editorial McGraw-Hill. México. 1148 p.
Zabaleta, G. 2014. Evaluación con opciones reales para la instalación de una planta de bioetanol. Tesis de Maestría en Economía. Colegio de Postgraduados. Montecillos. Texcoco. Estado de México. 98 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Miguel A. Cisneros López, José Alberto García Salazar, José Saturnino Mora Flores, Miguel Ãngel Martínez Damián, Roberto Carlos García Sánchez, José R. Valdez Lazalde, Marcos Portillo Vázquez

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
- The authors retain the copyright and transfer to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work registered with the Creative Commons attribution license, which allows third parties to use what is published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this magazine.
- Authors may make other independent and additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work It was first published in this magazine.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (for example on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and greater and faster dissemination of the work. published (see The Effect of Open Access).








